Dynamics 365 Implementation Roadmap: Month-by-Month Timeline

High-Level Implementation Timeline

Phase	Duration	Key Deliverables	Go-Live Readiness Gate
Pre-Project	8–12 weeks (concurrent with scoping)	Business case, vendor selection, SOW, project charter	Partner signed, budget approved, executive sponsor identified
Phase 1: Foundation	Months 1–3	BRD, design doc, security roles, org structure, initial config	Design sign-off, no design changes without change control
Phase 2: Build	Months 3–6	Configuration complete, integrations built, 1st data load, training plan	All blockers resolved, system ready for UAT
Phase 3: Test	Months 6–8	UAT done, performance tested, data validated, training complete	All critical issues resolved, 80%+ training completion, data sign-off
Phase 4: Deploy	Months 8–9 (plus 8 wks hypercare)	Final data load, go-live, hypercare support, transition to BAU	System stable, users productive, KPI tracking initiated

Pre-Project Phase (Weeks -8 to 0)

Many organizations underestimate pre-project duration. This phase sets the foundation for everything that follows. Rushing it creates downstream problems.

Week -8: Kick-Off & Assessment

• Stakeholder Workshop: C-suite, functional leaders (CFO, COO, VP Supply Chain, VP IT), project sponsor. Define goals, timeline expectations, budget, and non-negotiables.
• Current-State Assessment: Start inventory of systems, data quality, integrations, processes. Assign a business analyst to lead 2–3 week deep-dive.
• High-Level Business Case: Rough ROI estimate, timeline estimate, risk assessment.

Week -6 to -4: RFP & Vendor Evaluation

• RFP Distribution: Send to 3–5 implementation partners. Include your current-state assessment, modules in scope, timeline constraint, team composition requirements.
• Vendor Demos & References: Each vendor demos their methodology, shows reference implementations, and provides 2–3 reference customers you can call.
• Proposal Evaluation & Negotiation: Score proposals on experience, team quality, methodology, timeline feasibility, and price. Negotiate final contract terms.

Week -3 to 0: Contract & Planning

• Contract Signature: Execute MSA & SOW with partner. Lock in scope, timeline, pricing, team composition, SLAs, & support terms.
• Kickoff Meeting: Partner & your team meet to review SOW, confirm roles/responsibilities, establish communication cadence (weekly steering, biweekly functional leads, daily scrum for dev team).
• Project Charter & Schedule: Partner delivers project plan with task-level detail for months 1–3, rolled-up for months 4–9. Identify critical path & resource bottlenecks.
• Team Assembly: Assign business process leads, IT sponsor, change manager, data lead, testing lead. Confirm availability (ideally 50%+ of their time for key team members).

Phase 1: Foundation & Setup (Months 1–3)

Months 1–3 are about understanding requirements, designing the solution, & setting up the technical foundation. This phase is detail-heavy but relatively low-risk if executed well.

Month 1: Discovery & Requirements

Week 1–2:

• Partner conducts “process mapping” workshops with 10–15 business users across finance, supply chain, sales, operations. Document as-is processes in detail.
• IT team documents infrastructure readiness (networks, security, compliance requirements, integration roadmap).
• Data team starts legacy data assessment (volume, quality, mapping to Dynamics 365 entities).

Week 3–4:

• Partner presents findings & proposes to-be design: which Dynamics 365 features address each requirement? Where is custom development justified? Where will you standardize?
• Functional leads & business stakeholders review & approve to-be design.
• Business Requirements Document (BRD) is drafted: scope, requirements, design decisions, success metrics.

Month 2: Design & Architecture

Week 5–6:

• Partner’s solution architect & lead developer present detailed technical design: system architecture, data model, integrations, customization scope, security model, disaster recovery approach.
• Design reviews with IT & business stakeholders. Confirm alignment & identify risks.

Week 7–8:

• Formalize Statement of Work (SOW): itemize every module, process, report, integration. Define what’s in-scope vs. out-of-scope explicitly.
• Secure formal sign-off from CFO, COO, & IT Director on design & SOW. This is your baseline for change control.
• Security & compliance review: confirm data residency, audit logging, role-based access controls meet regulatory requirements.

Month 3: Setup & Initial Configuration

Week 9–10:

• Partner & IT provision cloud environments: dev, test, UAT, pre-production, production.
• Initial data model setup: legal entities, operating units, chart of accounts, product masters (simplified versions), vendor & customer masters (key 100–200 records).
• Security role design & testing: create 4–6 core roles (CFO, analyst, clerk, user, manager); test access controls in dev.
• Integration framework setup: APIs, logic apps, batch jobs. Test proof-of-concept integrations with 1–2 key systems.

Week 11–12:

• Partner trains your internal team on configuration best practices & the solution design.
• Identify gaps between design & reality. Log change requests formally (don’t implement without approval).
• Monthly executive steering meeting: confirm on schedule & budget. Address risks proactively.

End-of-Month-3 Gate: Design Sign-Off

Confirm:

• Design document is approved & signed by CFO, CIO, & functional leaders
• Initial configuration is in place & tested in dev environment
• No critical design issues identified; risks are documented & assigned mitigation owners
• Data migration approach is defined & pilot is planned for month 4
• Team is staffed & productivity is on track

Phase 2: Build & Configuration (Months 3–6)

This is where the system comes to life. You’re building modules, integrations, reports, & loading the first wave of real data. Timeline pressures peak here.

Month 3–4 (Overlap): Detailed Configuration

Week 9–14:

• Finance Module: GL setup, journal templates, budget models, intercompany transactions, consolidation rules, dimension-based reporting.
• Supply Chain Module: Inventory costing methods, vendor contracts, purchasing policies, planning parameters, warehouse management setup.
• Sales Module: Sales order templates, pricing policies, credit policies, invoice setup, returns processes.
• Other Modules: HR (if included), Project Ops (if included), Manufacturing (if relevant).
• Reporting: Build 5–8 core reports (GL trial balance, aging reports, inventory valuation, sales summary, purchasing summary) using SSRS or Power BI.
• Integration Development: Custom code (plugins, batch jobs, APIs) for system-to-system flows. Start with highest-priority integrations first.

Month 4–5: Data Migration Pilot

Week 14–20:

• First Data Migration (Wave 1 – Small Pilot): Load 3–6 months of clean, representative data from legacy system into test environment. This validates mappings & transformation logic without full volume risk.
• Data Quality Validation: Spot-check data, reconcile GL, confirm no data loss. Identify data quality issues in legacy system; fix root causes before larger migration.
• Test First Workflows: Run order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, plan-to-produce workflows end-to-end with real data. Identify configuration gaps & fixes.
• Training Curriculum Design: Partner & training lead develop training materials, job aids, videos, labs based on actual configured system.

Month 5–6: Build Completion & Integration Hardening

Week 20–26:

• Configuration Completion: All modules configured & tested in dev. All integrations built & passing unit tests in dev.
• Data Model Finalization: All masters (customers, vendors, products, GL accounts) loaded & validated for UAT cycle.
• Performance Tuning (Initial): Index optimization, query tuning, batch job scheduling. Address obvious bottlenecks before UAT.
• UAT Environment Preparation: Load cleaned historical data (12+ months) into UAT. Ensure UAT environment mirrors production configuration & data.
• User Documentation & Training Preparation: Complete job aids, quick-reference cards, video tutorials. Begin super-user training (20–30 power users).

End-of-Month-6 Gate: Build Completion

Confirm:

• All critical configuration is complete & tested in dev
• All integrations are functioning & data is flowing correctly
• Data migration wave 1 is complete; data quality issues are documented & fixes are planned
• UAT environment is ready (data loaded, configuration matches dev)
• Training curriculum is complete; super-user training is 80%+ complete
• No critical issues blocking UAT start

Phase 3: Test & Validate (Months 6–8)

This phase is high-stress but critical. You’re testing everything: functional workflows, data integrity, system performance, & user readiness. Issues discovered here are easier to fix than issues on day 1 of production.

Month 6: UAT Kick-Off & Parallel Data Migration

Week 25–30:

• UAT Begins: 20–40 business users (divided by module/process) execute 100+ test cases representing real workflows. Partner provides test scripts; business users validate.
• Wave 2 Data Migration (Parallel): While UAT is running on Wave 1 data, partner loads full historical data (12–24 months) into a pre-prod environment for parallel data validation. This accelerates the overall timeline.
• Defect Logging & Triage: As issues are found, log them formally. Triage into: blocker (fix before go-live), high (fix before cutover), medium (fix after go-live), low (document as known issue). Assign owners & target fix dates.
• Issue Resolution Cycle: Partner fixes defects in dev, re-tests in dev, promotes fix to UAT. Business user re-runs test. Confirm fix resolves issue without breaking others (regression testing).

Month 7: Intensive Testing & Issue Resolution

Week 30–35:

• UAT Continuation: 50–100% of test cases executed. Focus on blockers & high-priority issues. Average defect resolution time should be <3 days per issue.
• Performance Testing (Pre-Cutover): Load production-scale data into pre-prod. Run load testing (how many concurrent users?), stress testing (how much can it handle before breaking?), & batch job timing tests. Confirm system meets performance SLAs.
• Data Validation Completion: Wave 2 data is now fully validated. GL balances, AR/AP aging, inventory counts are reconciled & signed off by finance & supply chain leads.
• Integration Testing: Run end-to-end workflows with real data flowing through integrations. Confirm data lands in correct systems & in correct format.
• End-User Training Acceleration: Begin classroom/virtual training for 100% of users. Target: 80%+ trained by end of month 7.

Week 35–39:

• UAT Closure: All test cases executed. All blockers & highs resolved. Business signs off: “System is ready for production.”
• Cutover Dry-Run (Parallel): Run a full cutover simulation in a copy of pre-prod using scripted data. Execute final data load, GL reconciliation, workflow testing, & go-live checklist. Identify gaps in cutover plan & fix them.
• Hypercare Planning: Partner & IT finalize on-site/remote support model, escalation procedures, issue SLAs, hypercare coverage (24/7 for first 48 hours?).

Month 8: Go-Live Preparation & Final Validation

Week 39–43:

• Training Completion: Final training sessions. Confirm 80%+ user completion & competency validation. Assign super-users to support desks for day-1 go-live.
• Cutover Playbook Finalization: Detailed hour-by-hour cutover plan. Who does what? When? What’s the rollback decision point? Who makes the call to proceed vs. stop?
• Go-Live Checklist: Final system configuration review, performance test results, data validation sign-offs, training completion, security review, disaster recovery testing, go-live team assignments.
• Communications Push: Executive messaging to all users: “Go-live is X days away. Here’s what to expect.” Address concerns. Build momentum.

End-of-Month-8 Gate: Go-Live Readiness

Confirm all four gates are met:

• UAT Complete: All test cases passed, all blockers resolved, business sign-off obtained
• Data Validated: GL reconciled to penny, AR/AP aging matches legacy, inventory counts match, data migration sign-off obtained
• Performance Tested: System meets SLAs under production load; batch windows are acceptable
• Training Complete: 80%+ of users trained & validated; super-users are ready to support

Phase 4: Deploy & Cutover (Months 8–9)

Cutover is the most high-stakes phase. You’re going live with real data, real users, real transactions. Plan meticulously. Execute with discipline.

Month 8, Week 43–44: Final Data Load & Cutover Window

Day -2 (Friday afternoon):

• Announce cutover window to all users. Legacy systems will stop accepting new transactions at X time. Dynamics 365 goes live at Y time.
• Final data extracts from legacy systems. Load into staging database.

Day -1 (Saturday):

• Data validation & cleansing overnight. Final GL reconciliation. Confirm data integrity.
• Cutover team is on-call & monitoring.

Day 0 (Sunday morning):

• Hour 0–2: Final data load into production. GL reconciliation to legacy system (must balance to penny).
• Hour 2–4: System validation. Run critical workflows (create order, approve invoice, ship, receive). Confirm reports & dashboards are working.
• Hour 4–6: Test batch jobs (nightly GL posting, inventory valuation, aging calculations). Confirm they complete on schedule.
• Hour 6–8: Final sign-off meeting. CFO & COO review validation results. Decision: proceed to go-live or rollback?
• Hour 8+: Go-live announcement. Unlock Dynamics 365 for users. Cutover team monitors system closely for 24–72 hours.

Month 8–9: Hypercare & Stabilization

Week 44–52 (8 weeks post-go-live):

• Hypercare Support: Partner provides 24/7 on-site or remote support for first 48 hours (go-live weekend). Then shift to business hours support (8am–6pm) with on-call for emergencies weeks 1–4.
• Daily Issues Triage: Hypercare team reviews support tickets daily. Critical issues (system down, data corruption) are fixed same-day. High issues (workflow broken) are fixed within 8 hours.
• User Coaching: Super-users are stationed at key departments (finance, supply chain, operations) to help users navigate the system & answer questions.
• Daily Data Validation: GL posting, inventory receipts, sales orders—spot check 10 transactions per function daily. Flag anomalies immediately.
• Weekly Executive Reports: System uptime, user adoption %, critical/high issues, KPI progress. Address trends proactively.
• Hypercare Exit (Week 8): Transition support from partner to internal IT & retained support vendor. Formal knowledge transfer session. Partner remains available for escalations.

End-of-Month-9 Gate: Stabilization Complete

Confirm:

• System uptime ≥99% (acceptable <1 hour unplanned downtime in 4 weeks)
• User adoption ≥80% (most users logging in & completing daily tasks in Dynamics 365)
• Data integrity validated (GL balances, transactional volumes match expectations)
• Critical & high issues resolved (<5 outstanding medium/low issues only)
• Business processes running smoothly; no manual workarounds needed

Timeline Compression Strategies

Can you compress a typical 10–12 month implementation into 8 months? Yes, but there’s a price.

Parallel Workstreams

Instead of sequential phases (design → build → test), run workstreams in parallel:

• Workstream 1 (Finance): Design & configure GL, AP, AR, consolidation. Start UAT in month 4 while supply chain is still building.
• Workstream 2 (Supply Chain): Design & configure inventory, procurement, warehouse. Parallel with finance UAT.
• Workstream 3 (Integration & Data): Runs continuously from month 1 (API design, pilot data load in month 2, full data migration in month 5).

Risk: More complex coordination. Easy to create dependencies or data conflicts. Requires very strong project management.

Sprint-Based Delivery

Instead of a 12-week design phase followed by a 16-week build, use 2-week sprints:

• Sprint 1–2: Design + build core GL module. UAT starts in sprint 3.
• Sprint 3–4: UAT GL. Design + build supply chain in parallel.
• Sprint 5–6: UAT supply chain. Build integrations in parallel.

Benefit: Issues surface faster. Business can validate & provide feedback iteratively.

Risk: Requires disciplined scope control. Easy to let scope creep in each sprint. Needs strong product owner & frequent demos to stakeholders.

Pre-Configured Templates & Accelerators

Many implementation partners offer industry-specific templates (templates for manufacturing, retail, professional services). These include pre-built configurations, reports, and integrations. You customize on top of the template rather than building from scratch.

Benefit: Saves 4–8 weeks of configuration effort.

Risk: Templates may not match your exact business model. You may end up customizing the template more than building from scratch. Choose partners with strong templates for your industry.

Reduced Customization Scope

Every custom line of code adds 1–2 weeks to timeline & increases risk. Ruthlessly eliminate customization:

• Use standard Dynamics 365 features (even if they require process change)
• Use Power Platform low-code tools (Power Automate, Power Apps) instead of custom plugins
• Defer "nice-to-have" customizations to phase 2 (post-go-live optimization)

Benefit: 20–30% timeline reduction possible.

Risk: Requires business process change & user acceptance. Some users won’t like it. Requires strong change management.

Early Data Migration

Load Wave 1 data in month 3–4 (instead of waiting until month 6). This allows 6–8 weeks to discover data quality issues & fix them in the source system before large-scale migration. Saves time & reduces cutover risk.

Benefit: Confident data migration. Fewer cutover surprises.

Risk: Requires data team to start early & work in parallel with build team. Needs clear data governance (who owns data quality?).

Realistic Compression: Use 2–3 of these tactics together (e.g., parallel workstreams + sprint-based delivery + pre-configured templates) to compress 12 months to 8–9 months. Don’t try to compress further without accepting significant risk.

Red Flags: When Timelines Slip

Scope creep, resource constraints, & data quality issues are the top causes of timeline slippage. Watch for these red flags:

Red Flag #1: Scope Creep in Months 1–3

You discover 5–10 new requirements after kickoff. Business users say, “We also need to track X. Can you add it?” This is normal, but uncontrolled scope creep cascades downstream.

Response: Implement formal change control. Every new requirement gets logged, scoped, estimated, & approved by CFO & project sponsor before implementation. Many will be deferred to post-go-live phase 2.

Red Flag #2: Design Changes Late in Phase 2

In month 5–6, business discovers a workflow won’t work as designed. You need to redesign & rebuild. This creates a 4–6 week cascade delay.

Prevention: UAT should start in month 5 or 6, not month 7. Start with a UAT pilot (small group, 1 module) in month 5. Discover design issues early when you can still fix them quickly.

Red Flag #3: Data Quality Issues in Wave 2 (Month 5–6)

Wave 2 migration loads 12+ months of historical data, but data quality is worse than expected. 20% of customers have invalid formats. Vendors have duplicates. Chart of accounts is incomplete.

Response: Load Wave 2 early (month 4–5). Discover issues while you still have time to fix in the source system. Have data team on standby to cleanse & re-load if needed.

Red Flag #4: Inadequate Testing Duration (Month 7)

UAT is supposed to run 6 weeks but business users are too busy. You compress it to 3 weeks. Issues that would have been found in testing slip into production.

Prevention: Executive sponsor must enforce “UAT is non-negotiable.” Business users should dedicate 50% of time for 6 weeks. Escalate if business is not available—delay go-live rather than skip testing.

Red Flag #5: Integration Development Delays

Custom integrations (APIs, middleware, batch jobs) take longer than estimated. Third-party vendor is slow to provide credentials or API documentation. Your internal developer is struggling with plugin architecture.

Response: Identify integration risks early (month 2). For complex integrations, allocate extra time budget or bring in contractor expertise. Prioritize integrations; defer non-critical ones to phase 2.

Red Flag #6: Key Person Leaves Mid-Project

Your data lead or lead developer resigns. Knowledge walks out the door. Timeline slips 4–6 weeks while replacement ramps up.

Prevention: Build knowledge redundancy. Cross-train 2 people on each critical role. Maintain detailed documentation. In partner contracts, require that partners don’t swap out key team members mid-project without your approval.

Red Flag #7: Infrastructure or Licensing Issues Late in Project

In month 7, you discover Azure capacity constraints. Or licensing is incomplete (you forgot to license a module). These cause last-minute delays.

Prevention: Finalize infrastructure & licensing in month 1. Don’t wait until month 7. Have IT & finance align on capacity & licensing early.

Early Warning System: Track these metrics weekly & escalate if trends are negative:

• % of action items closed on schedule (target: ≥90%)
• % of design/UAT issues resolved on-time (target: ≥85%)
• Team resource utilization (target: 50%+ for business leads, 80%+ for partner team)
• Scope change requests per month (target: <2 major changes per month)

Governance Checkpoints & Executive Cadence

Strong governance prevents projects from drifting. Establish a formal governance structure from day 1.

Executive Steering Committee (Monthly during Months 1–6, Bi-Weekly Months 7–8)

• Members: CFO (sponsor), CIO, COO, VP Supply Chain, implementation partner lead
• Agenda (30–45 minutes): Schedule performance (on-track, at-risk, off-track?), budget utilization, key risks & mitigation, scope changes, executive decisions needed
• Decisions: Approve scope changes. Resolve resource conflicts. Escalate timeline risks. Green-light phase gates.

Project Leadership Team (Weekly during Months 1–3, Bi-Weekly Months 4–8)

• Members: Project manager, functional leads (finance, supply chain, sales, ops), IT lead, partner lead, data lead
• Agenda (60 minutes): Week-by-week progress, blockers, issue triage (which defects must be fixed this week?), risk updates, upcoming milestones
• Decisions: Prioritize backlog. Make technical decisions. Escalate risks to steering committee.

Phase Gate Reviews (Every 4 Weeks)

Before entering each phase, confirm prerequisites are met:

• Phase 1 Entry Gate (Month 0 → Month 1): Partner signed, team assigned, project charter approved, kick-off held
• Phase 2 Entry Gate (Month 3 → Month 3, overlap): Design approved, no critical design risks, initial config in dev, data assessment complete
• Phase 3 Entry Gate (Month 6 → Month 6, overlap): Build complete, UAT environment ready, all config tested, training curriculum ready
• Phase 4 Entry Gate (Month 8): UAT complete, data validated, performance tested, training complete, cutover playbook finalized, all four go-live gates met

Executive Checkpoint Format

Present status in 5 sections:

1. Schedule: Are we on track for current milestone & overall go-live date? If delayed, by how many days/weeks?
2. Budget: Actual spend vs. budgeted. Any overruns? Forecast final cost.
3. Scope: Changes requested vs. approved this period. Are we controlling scope?
4. Quality: Open defects by severity (blocker/high/medium/low). Defect resolution trend (improving or getting worse?)
5. Risks: Top 3 active risks. Mitigation plan for each. Any new risks emerging?

Business Central vs. Finance & Operations Roadmaps

Dynamics 365 has two primary ERP tracks for mid-market and enterprise organizations: Business Central (designed for small and mid-sized businesses, typically under a few hundred users) and the finance and operations apps suite—comprising Dynamics 365 Finance and Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management as separate, individually licensable products (commonly still referred to as "F&O" in the industry). Microsoft does not publish hard user-count thresholds between the two tracks; the right choice depends on complexity, integration requirements, and regulatory scope as much as headcount. The timelines below reflect typical implementation patterns for each tier.

Business Central Roadmap

Phase	Duration	Notes
Pre-Project (Assessment, Vendor, Planning)	6–10 weeks	Smaller scope = shorter pre-project
Phase 1: Foundation (Design, Setup, Initial Config)	8 weeks	Simpler data model = faster setup
Phase 2: Build & Configuration	10–12 weeks	2–3 modules, less custom development
Phase 3: Test & Validate	6–8 weeks	UAT often 4 weeks (smaller user base)
Phase 4: Deploy & Hypercare	6 weeks	Faster stabilization = shorter hypercare
Total Implementation	6–8 months	Typical range for mid-market

Finance & Operations Roadmap (Dynamics 365 Finance + Supply Chain Management)

Phase	Duration	Notes
Pre-Project (Assessment, Vendor, Planning)	10–14 weeks	Larger scope = longer pre-project assessment
Phase 1: Foundation (Design, Setup, Initial Config)	12 weeks	Complex data model, many integrations, enterprise governance
Phase 2: Build & Configuration	16–20 weeks	4–6 modules, significant custom development, complex supply chain
Phase 3: Test & Validate	8–12 weeks	UAT 6–8 weeks, large user base, complex workflows
Phase 4: Deploy & Hypercare	8 weeks	Longer stabilization, 24/7 support, complex cutover
Total Implementation	10–14 months	Typical range for enterprise

Key Differences:

• Complexity: F&O is 2–3x more complex (more modules, deeper features, enterprise integrations)
• Testing: F&O requires longer UAT due to larger user base & regulatory requirements
• Data Migration: F&O often involves 24+ months of historical data vs. 12 months for BC
• Customization Risk: F&O projects often have more custom code (plugins, reports, integrations), increasing risk & timeline
• Support Model: F&O projects typically require longer hypercare (8 weeks vs. 4 weeks for BC)

Methodology

This roadmap reflects real-world timelines from 80+ Dynamics 365 implementations tracked from 2020–2026 across mid-market & enterprise organizations in finance, supply chain, manufacturing, & professional services sectors.

Data Sources: Implementation case studies, partner methodology documentation (Microsoft Sure Step methodology; Microsoft Success by Design framework), Dynamics 365 release notes & roadmap documentation, interviews with 15+ successful implementation leads.

Analytical Approach: Phase timelines & milestone gates are derived from observed patterns across implementations with varying scope. Compression tactics are based on documented schedule improvements from specific techniques (parallel workstreams, sprint delivery, pre-configured templates). Red flags reflect common root causes of slippage from post-mortem analyses.

Limitations: Timelines assume typical scope (2–4 modules, 200–1000 users, 3–5 integrations). Organizations with exceptional complexity (multinational, highly customized legacy systems, immature governance, tight external deadlines) may experience longer implementations. Conversely, organizations with strong IT governance, clean data, & minimal customization may compress timelines by 2–4 weeks.

Data Currency: Information reflects Dynamics 365 capabilities, governance practices, & testing standards as of June 2026.

Sources

• Dynamics 365 Finance product page — Microsoft (current pricing and product tiers, including Finance Premium)
• Dynamics 365 Business Central product page — Microsoft (SMB positioning)
• Introduction to the Success by Design framework — Microsoft Learn
• Choose a methodology for your Dynamics 365 project — Microsoft Learn (waterfall, agile, hybrid; Sure Step references)
• Dynamics 365 Finance 2026 release wave 1 overview — Microsoft Learn

Last validated June 19, 2026.